Time: Tue Oct 21 11:38:54 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA03636;
	Tue, 21 Oct 1997 09:37:45 -0700 (MST)
	by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA04192;
	Tue, 21 Oct 1997 09:35:22 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 09:36:21 -0700
To: snetnews@world.std.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: WAKE UP CALL, NOT DEATHKNELL...
References: <199710210504.VAA06628@calvino.alaska.net>

I think the writer below would be
a whole lot more honest, and brief,
if he just came out and insulted
Jack McLamb publicly.  

Why beat around the bush, if this 
is his real purpose.

Confer at "Ecological fallacy"
in any reference work on social
science research methdology.

Jack was a cop, therefore ...
... therefore WHAT?

TILT!

/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com


At 11:15 AM 10/21/97 -0700, you wrote:
>
>->  SearchNet's   SNETNEWS   Mailing List
>
>Henry Ayre wrote:
>> 
>> ->  SearchNet's   SNETNEWS   Mailing List
>> 
>> A few hours ago someone opined that the McLamb/Johnson fiasco sounded the
>> deathknell of the Patriot movement. Was this really a Patriot who suggested
>> that? Shirley Allen is just one incident in a long line of abuses of
>> citizens by authoritarian figures. What went wrong? Lack of individual
>> determination (with the exception of the other Shirley who was arrested)
>> and the desire to be led... sheeplike. And, of course, a thoroughly poor
>> choice of leaders in the first place.
>> 
>> What to do? Quit? Or fix it since it is certainly broken? I would say, fix
>> it! Apparently there are a number of people who would be willing to "do the
>> walk to Shirley's place," but they would like it to be a coordinated
>> effort. Is this really all that hard to organize in this age of electronic
>> communications? What am I missing here?  H. Ayre.
>> 
>> -> Send "subscribe   snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>> ->  Posted by: "Henry Ayre" <henri@Alaska.NET>
>
>I would say that the incident spells the deathknell to cop 'leaders' in
>     the patriot movement, and not the movement itself.  I would like to
>     repeat myself here, for the umpteenth time; cops - any line of 
>     of cops - are selected from a certain group of humans, and this
>     group MUST have the physical and mental aptitude acceptable to the
>     ones doing the selecting.  Police forces of any and all political
>     sub-divisions, are hereditary entities; that is, the mind-set of
>     these groups was established many, many years ago, to the detriment
>     of those wanting to bring human reasoning into these forces.  This
>     is clearly established by the fact that very few cops ever volun-
>     tarily distant themselves from the inadequate policies of the sys-
>     tem, however evil it may be.  Those who retire, or are eliminated
>     from the system, never shed their basic instincts, as can be seen
>     by the actions of Jack McLamb in the Shirley Allen affair. These 
>     instincts are so strong in these cops that they are basically con-
>     fined, socially, to their own groups, as others will not accept 
>     them.  This, in turn, places these people in a very high suicide
>     category.  
>By accepting these rejects as leaders by the patriot movement, we are
>     damaging any favorable relationship we may have with the rest of
>     the nation, and this makes recruitment much more difficult.  I 
>     would suggest, therefore, that we decline any leadership role from
>     this source.  They have enough problems as it is.  Let them stew
>     in their own sauce.  
>
>					Ray Earnest
>
>-> Send "subscribe   snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>->  Posted by: Ray Earnest <cen11156@mail.ld.centuryinter.net>
>
>
>

===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris      : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA;   M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com       : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best 06
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone 07
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13

      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail