Time: Tue Oct 29 15:52:41 1996
To: defense@mindspring.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: mindspring.com: no data known)
Cc: 
Bcc: 

>Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 15:52:22 -0700 (MST)
>From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@primenet.com>
>To: [address in tool bar]
>Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: mindspring.com: no data known)
>
>The original message was received at Tue, 29 Oct 1996 15:52:09 -0700 (MST)
>from ip244.tus.primenet.com [198.68.42.244]
>
>   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
><defense@mindspring.com>
>
>   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>550 <defense@mindspring.com>... Host unknown (Name server: mindspring.com: no data known)
>
>   ----- Original message follows -----
>
>Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 15:52:09 -0700 (MST)
>To: libertylaw@www.ultimate.org
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: Northwest Ordinance
>
><snip>
>>>"Whatever the limitation upon her powers as a government whilst
>>>in a territorial condition, whether from the ordinance of 1787 or
>>>the legislation of Congress, it ceased to have any operative
>>>force, except as voluntarily adopted by her, after she became a
>>>State of Union. On her admission, she at once became entitled to
>>>and possessed of all the rights of dominion and sovereignty which
>>>belonged to the original States. She was admitted, and could be
>>>admitted, only.....'on an equal footing with the original States
>>>in all respects whatever."]
>>
>>
>>Great info for reading.  Thanks for all of the work.
>>
>>Would you agree that the only available conclusion is all States in the
>>Union [several States] shall be " one of the United States, with equal
>>footing to the original States in all respects whatsoever"
>>
>>Would you agree that the authority for this is the Northwest Ordinance of
>>1787?  This is referred to in the Alaskas Statutes books as the authority,
>>but it was not followed.
>
>The Northwest Ordinance is an
>excellent source of pertinent
>historical evidence for the
>true construction of the phrase
>"Citizen of the United States"
>in the organic ["organizing"]
>Constitution.  In it, the 
>qualifications for serving in
>the territorial assembly was that
>one must be a "Citizen of one of
>the United States," which tells
>you clearly what is intended.
>
>Here we see the phrase "one of".
>
>The Northwest Ordinance was
>drafted right about the same
>time as the Constitution for
>the United States of America, 
>if I am not mistaken.  See 
>Chapter 11 in The Federal Zone
>for the pertinent clause, and
>some commentary on the Ordinance.
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>
>
>===========================================================
>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.:  pmitch@primenet.com                  
>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>===========================================================
>
>
>
>
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail